Abstract
This study examined the relationship between digital competence and attitude towards information and communication technology (ICT) adoption among Business Education student-teachers in South-West Nigerian colleges of education. The integration of ICT into teaching depends on the competence and disposition of prospective teachers, yet the association between these constructs has rarely been quantified for Business Education in low-resource settings. Anchored in the technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory, the study adopted a correlational survey design. A sample of 149 student-teachers completed a structured questionnaire measuring digital competence, attitude towards ICT adoption and general attitude towards ICT, with Cronbach alpha coefficients of .84, .80 and .85 respectively. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple linear regression. The respondents reported moderate levels of competence and moderately positive attitudes. Digital competence was significantly and positively related to attitude towards adoption and to general attitude towards ICT, while the two attitudinal facets were strongly associated. Competence and general attitude jointly accounted for 36.1% of the variance in attitude towards adoption, although competence ceased to be a unique predictor once attitude was controlled. The study concluded that attitudinal disposition, rather than competence alone, was the more proximal correlate of adoption, and it recommended that teacher preparation integrate competence building with attention to attitude.
References
22 References[1] M. O. Yusuf, “Information and communication technology and education: Analysing the Nigerian national policy for information technology,” International Education Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 316–321, 2005.
[2] C. Buabeng-Andoh, “Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature,” International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 136–155, 2012.
[3] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
[4] D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, “Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249688.
[5] M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
[6] T. Teo, “Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers,” Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 302–312, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.
[7] T. Teo, “Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test,” Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2432–2440, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
[8] A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
[9] I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
[10] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
[11] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 2003.
[12] A. Albirini, “Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers,” Computers & Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 373–398, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013.
[13] M. O. Yusuf and M. R. Balogun, “Student-teachers’ competence and attitude towards information and communication technology: A case study in a Nigerian university,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–36, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6041.
[14] G. Sang, M. Valcke, J. van Braak, and J. Tondeur, “Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology,” Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.
[15] C. Player-Koro, “Factors influencing teachers’ use of ICT in education,” Education Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i1.22015.
[16] A. Tella, A. Tella, O. M. Toyobo, L. O. Adika, and A. A. Adeyinka, “An assessment of secondary school teachers’ uses of ICTs: Implications for further development of ICT use in Nigerian secondary schools,” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5–17, 2007.
[17] J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[18] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[19] G. Falloon, “From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2449–2472, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.
[20] J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, G. Sang, J. Voogt, P. Fisser, and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence,” Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 134–144, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.
[21] E. J. Instefjord and E. Munthe, “Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 67, pp. 37–45, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.
[22] P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Copyright and License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Olafare Festus Oladimeji
Abstract viewed: 1 times