Withdrawal, Retraction, and Correction Policy

Post-Publication Integrity

Withdrawal, Retraction & Correction Policy

The Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning uses proportionate, transparent, and traceable editorial actions to preserve the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record.

Primary GuidanceCOPERetraction guidance and publication-ethics best practiceView COPE Guidance
Policy Principle

Preserving an Accurate Scholarly Record

Published content should remain stable and accessible wherever possible. When a scientific, ethical, legal, authorship, privacy, or technical concern is identified, the journal assesses the evidence and selects the least disruptive action capable of correcting or protecting the record. Substantive actions are documented through persistent notices linked to the affected article.

01Before Public Publication

Withdrawal

Used mainly for manuscripts that have not entered the public scholarly record. An Online First article, or any article with a public landing page and stable publication record, is treated as published scholarship and remains traceable through an appropriate notice rather than silent deletion.

02Unreliable Published Record

Retraction

Used when a major error, misconduct, unethical research, compromised review, or another serious problem makes an article or its central findings unreliable.

03Reliable but Amendable Record

Correction

Used when the article remains reliable but requires a visible amendment, clarification, or correction.

04Interim or Exceptional Action

Concern, Removal or Replacement

Used when an investigation is incomplete or exceptional legal, privacy, safety, or public-health circumstances require further action.

Before Public Publication

Manuscript Withdrawal Before Publication

Withdrawal ordinarily applies to an accepted manuscript that has not yet been publicly published. Acceptance alone does not create a published article.

01

Possible Grounds

Accidental duplicate processing, duplicate submission, serious error, plagiarism, fabricated or falsified material, unethical research, compromised review, legal risk, or another substantial breach identified before publication.

02

Author Request

An author request must provide a clear written explanation and is not effective until confirmed by the journal. Withdrawal must not be used to avoid an integrity investigation or to submit elsewhere while assessment remains open.

03

Public Record, if One Exists

If content has already appeared publicly or received a DOI, the landing page and DOI remain traceable. The file may be replaced by a notice that explains the action as fully as confidentiality, legal duties, and procedural fairness permit.

Serious Reliability Concerns

Article Retraction

Retraction is used when the integrity, reliability, provenance, or ethical legitimacy of a published article is seriously compromised and cannot be corrected adequately through a narrower amendment.

Potential Grounds
  • Unreliable findings caused by major error or research misconduct
  • Fabricated, falsified, manipulated, or seriously unreliable data or images
  • Plagiarism or substantial unattributed reuse
  • Duplicate, redundant, or unauthorised publication
  • Unethical research or missing required approval or consent
  • Unauthorised use of confidential, personal, copyrighted, or protected material
  • Compromised, fabricated, or manipulated peer review
  • A major undisclosed competing interest that materially undermines the work
01

Separate Notice

A freely accessible notice identifies the article, explains the reason, states who initiated the action where appropriate, and distinguishes misconduct from honest error when the evidence permits.

02

Persistent Article and DOI

The original article and DOI normally remain accessible so that the publication history is traceable. The webpage and PDF are marked clearly and linked to the notice.

03

Author Agreement Not Required

Retraction may proceed without agreement from every author when the evidence supports the action. The notice may state whether authors agreed, disagreed, or did not respond.

04

No Partial Retraction

A correction is used when reliable parts can be preserved clearly; full retraction is used when the article’s reliability cannot be separated adequately.

Procedural Fairness

Investigation & Decision Process

Post-publication decisions follow an evidence-based assessment, conflict management, and a reasonable opportunity for relevant parties to respond.

01

Concern Recorded

The journal logs the allegation, error report, evidence, and affected record securely.

02

Evidence Reviewed

Editors may examine the article, source records, data, images, reports, correspondence, approvals, and other relevant materials.

03

Relevant Parties Contacted

Authors and other affected parties are invited to respond. The journal may contact institutions, funders, ethics committees, or competent authorities when independent investigation is required.

04

Proportionate Action

An authorised, non-conflicted editor determines whether no action, correction, expression of concern, retraction, withdrawal, removal, or replacement is appropriate.

Interim Public Notice

Expression of Concern

An expression of concern may alert readers to a potentially serious problem when available evidence does not yet support a final correction or retraction decision.

When It May Be Used

Serious but Unresolved Concern

It may be appropriate when an investigation is incomplete, delayed, inconclusive, legally restricted, procedurally unreliable, or dependent on evidence the journal cannot yet obtain.

How It Is Presented

Linked, Factual and Reviewable

The notice identifies the article, describes the concern without overstating unverified conclusions, remains freely accessible, and is reviewed when additional evidence becomes available.

Reliable but Amendable Record

Corrections

A correction is used when an error or omission requires amendment but the article’s central findings and overall reliability remain intact.

Limited Correction

Errors Without Material Impact

Typographical, formatting, affiliation, citation, or limited factual errors may be corrected when they do not change data, interpretation, authorship, ethical status, or central conclusions.

Substantive Correction

Interpretive but Non-Invalidating Impact

Errors affecting a table, figure, analysis, statement, or interpretation may be corrected when the article remains reliable and the amendment can be described transparently.

Transparency PrincipleNo Silent Substantive Corrections

Substantive changes are documented through a correction notice, version statement, updated article page, or another persistent editorial record. Purely typographical changes that do not affect meaning may be corrected without a formal notice.

Public Scholarly Record

Online First Articles

An Online First article is a final published record once released online with stable public metadata and article files. Its page must show whether the DOI is assigned or pending. A temporary DOI-pending label does not make the record provisional and must be resolved on the same article record without resetting its original first-publication date. Issue assignment likewise does not erase or reset the publication history.

01

Correction or Updated Version

When the article remains reliable, a corrected file may replace the earlier file only when the change and version history are explained through a persistent editorial notice.

02

Retraction or Exceptional Withdrawal

When a serious concern invalidates the article, the journal issues a retraction or, in exceptional early-publication circumstances, a transparent withdrawal notice. The DOI and public record remain traceable.

Exceptional Measures

Article Removal & Replacement

Removal and replacement are exceptional measures used only when ordinary correction, expression of concern, or retraction cannot address the risk adequately.

Exceptional Removal

Content Removed, Record Retained

Content may be removed when continued access would violate a legal order, serious privacy or confidentiality rights, defamation law, or create a substantial public-health or safety risk.

  • Bibliographic metadata and the DOI remain visible where legally possible.
  • A removal notice explains the reason as fully as circumstances permit.
  • The publication history remains identifiable and traceable.
Retraction and Republication

Corrected Work Linked to the Original

In exceptional cases, an unreliable article may be retracted and a corrected work published separately after re-evaluation.

  • The original article and retraction notice remain accessible.
  • The corrected publication is identified as a separate version or work.
  • Notices and metadata link the original, retraction, and corrected publication.
Editorial Charges

No Charge for Integrity Actions

The journal does not charge authors for a withdrawal, correction, expression of concern, retraction, removal, or replacement arising from an integrity concern, serious error, or necessary correction of the scholarly record.

Editorial Action FeeFree of ChargeNo post-publication integrity fee
Policy Administration

Status, Ownership & Review

Policy status: Active. Policy owner: J-HyTEL Editorial Board. Last reviewed: 5 August 2026. The policy is reviewed periodically and when applicable publication-ethics guidance, legal requirements, or journal procedures change.