摘要
本研究旨在评估在西苏门答腊省第一国立职业学校(SMK Negeri 1 Sumatera Barat)的基础职业课程中,采用基于问题的学习(PBL)模式结合焦点小组讨论(FGD)方法对学生学习成果的影响。 我们采用准实验研究方法,设置了两个样本组:实验组(X E2班)实施基于问题学习(PBL)模式结合焦点小组讨论(FGD)方法的教学,对照组(X E1班)则接受直接指导。 我们通过前测和后测评估收集学习成果数据,并采用t检验分析两组之间的均值差异。研究结果显示,实验组学生的学习成果显著提高,后测平均分为87.48,而对照组为78.48。 假设检验表明两组之间存在显著差异,计算得出的t值(4.086)超过了临界t值(1.66)。 这表明,采用PBL模式结合FGD方法对学生的学习成果产生了积极影响。这些研究结果突显了PBL模式作为一种有效教学策略在提升学生学习成果方面的潜力,并为教育领域的进一步发展奠定了基础。
RIS is compatible with Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Immediate opening depends on the visitor's browser and reference-manager settings.
参考
24 References[1] S. Kojongian et al., “Pengaruh model Problem Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar simulasi digital siswa SMK,” Edutik J. Pendidik. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 597–601, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.53682/edutik.v1i6.3207
[2] Kemendikbudristek, “Buku Saku: Tanya Jawab Kurikulum merdeka,” Manual. Sekretariat Jenderal, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi, Jakarta. 2021.
[3] D. Paradina, C. Connie, R. M.-J. K. Fisika, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa di kelas X,” J. Kumparan Fis., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 169–176, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.2.3.169-176
[4] T. Djonomiarjo Guru SMK Negeri and P. Kab Pohuwato, “Pengaruh model Problem Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar,” Aksara J. Ilmu Pendidik. Nonform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–46, Mar. 2020. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.5.1.39-46.2019
[5] M. Syafei and J. Silalahi, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran mekanika teknik kelas X desain pemodelan dan informasi bangunan SMK Negeri 1 Pariaman,” CIVED, vol. 5, no. 4, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v5i4.102483
[6] S. Meilasari and U. Y.-B. J. Pendidikan, “Kajian model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam pembelajaran di sekolah,” J. Pendidik. Biol. dan Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2598–7453, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1849
[7] T. Juniarso, “Keefektifan model Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan proses sains,” Didakt. J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Pengetah., vol. 19, no. 3, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.30651/didaktis.v19i3.4419
[8] B. Prima, F. Hermuttaqien, L. Aras, and S. I. Lestari, “Penerapan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–22, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.56393/kognisi.v2i4.1354
[9] M. F. Ardiansyah, N. Y. Setyaputri, U. Nusantara, and P. Kediri, “Memperdalam karakter religius siswa SMK melalui teknik Focus Group Discussion,” Prosiding SEMDIKJAR, 2021.
[10] Z. Mustadh’afin and Y. Suharyat, “Peningkatan keaktifan belajar siswa pada materi PAI melalui metode Focus Group Discussion di kelas XI SMAN 8 Kota Bekasi,” Sejah. J. Inspirasi Mengabdi untuk Negeri, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 145–154, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.58192/sejahtera.v2i1.467
[11] A. J. Purwanto, “Implementasi model pembelajaran Focus Group Discussion tema Bjorka dan Hacker mata pelajaran matematika di SMK,” Res. PurwantoMitra Pendidik., 2022.
[12] H. Kurniawan et al., “Penerapan Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran elektronika mikroprosesor di kelas X SMK Negeri 5 Telkom,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 24, Feb. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22373/crc.v5i1.8223
[13] J. E. Firdaus and Y. Prayudi, “Pengembangan backend media sosial dengan menggunakan metode Scrum,” Edusaintek J. Pendidik., Sains dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 416–430, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v11i2.1020
[14] M. Greenstone and T. Gayer, “Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics,” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 21–44, Jan. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.02.004
[15] D. Zhang et al., “Testing the effectiveness of motivation-based teaching in nursing English course: A quasi-experimental study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 122, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105723
[16] M. Yusuf, “Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan penelitian gabungan,” Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
[17] Y. Xu, “Investigating the effects of digital multimodal composing on Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance: A quasi-experimental study,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 785–805, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1945635
[18] O. S.-E. C. E. Journal, “Theories of child development and their impact on early childhood education and care,” Educ. J., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 15–30, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01271-5
[19] C. Bonwell and J. Eison, “Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports,” 1991.
[20] K. A. Nguyen et al., “Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review,” J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
[21] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
[22] A. Kozanitis et al., “Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis,” Higher Educ., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1377–1394, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
[23] K. McLay et al., “Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: Sensemaking through reflexive inquiry,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1161–1177, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10192-6
[24] J. Hattie, H. T.-R. of educational research, “The power of feedback,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Copyright and License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Safitri Agustin, Hanesman, Efrizon, Hendra Hidayat