摘要
本研究探讨了微型教学作为一种有效的教学策略,通过STEAM(科学、技术、工程、艺术和数学)活动教授编程中的序列结构。该研究利用Micro:bit平台,将动手实践与跨学科问题解决相结合,以增强小学生的概念理解。 本研究采用结构化行动研究方法,引导两名六年级学生使用LED和Micro:bit环境构建并编程圣诞树模型。研究结果表明,在学生从Scratch的基础编程知识过渡到涉及硬件的更高级应用过程中,微型教学在促进参与度和理解力方面发挥了重要作用。 尽管面临时间限制和知识转移困难等挑战,该方法仍显著提升了学生对程序顺序的理解。这些结果凸显了将微型教学与STEAM方法相结合的潜力,能够使抽象的编程概念对年轻学习者而言更易理解、更具吸引力且更具实用性。 针对未来实施的建议包括:加强支架式教学、提供迭代学习机会以及延长课程时长,以应对已识别的挑战并优化教学效果。
RIS is compatible with Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Immediate opening depends on the visitor's browser and reference-manager settings.
Declarations reported in the published article
Author Contributions
Margarita Rafti: Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. Emmanouil D. Milakis: Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, Supervision. Constantina Corazon Argyrakou: Formal Analysis, Data Curation. Dimitra G. Vangeli: Writing – Review & Editing, Validation. Maria Christina Katsarou: Writing – Review & Editing, Validation. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We would like to sincerely thank the students and their families who participated in this study for their enthusiasm, dedication, and valuable contributions. Their engagement was instrumental in exploring the application of microteaching within the STEAM framework.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 13Ethics Approval
All participants in this study provided informed consent prior to their involvement, ensuring that they were fully aware of the research objectives, procedures, and their rights as participants. Given that the study involved educational activities with minimal risk, explicit parental consent was obtained for all student participants. The research was conducted in strict compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679), a European Union regulation that governs data protection and privacy for all individuals within the EU and the European Economic Area. This regulation sets high standards for the processing of personal data, ensuring confidentiality, anonymity, and secure data handling. No personally identifiable information was recorded, and all data were securely stored and used solely for research purposes. As this study was conducted independently, without direct involvement of a medical or psychological intervention, and within the framework of standard educational practices, no additional ethical approval from a university ethics committee was required. However, all ethical considerations, including voluntary participation and the right to withdraw at any time, were strictly adhered to throughout the study.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 13Data Availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Due to privacy restrictions, the data are not publicly available.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 14Funding
This work was not supported by any funding agency or grant.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 14Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 14Generative AI Disclosure
During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT4o to assist in improving the readability, language, and overall structure of the manuscript. Following the use of this tool, the authors thoroughly reviewed and edited the content, ensuring its accuracy and integrity. The authors take full responsibility for the content and conclusions presented in the published article.
View statement in PDF · PDF page 14参考
65 References[1] G. Yakman, "STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education," in Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT-19) Conference: Research on Technology, Innovation, Design & Engineering Teaching, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2008. http://www.steamedu.com/2088_PATT_Publication.pdf
[2] J. Bazler and M. Van Sickle, Eds., Cases on STEAM Education in Practice. IGI Global, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2334-5
[3] T. Costantino, "STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education," Arts Education Policy Review, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973
[4] V. A. Segarra, B. Natalizio, C. V. Falkenberg, S. Pulford, and R. M. Holmes, "STEAM: Using the arts to train well-rounded and creative scientists," Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19-1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1360
[5] C. F. Quigley, D. Herro, and F. M. Jamil, "Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 117, no. 1-2, pp. 1–12, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
[6] D. Herro, C. Quigley, and H. Cian, "The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field," Action in Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 172–190, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
[7] D. Herro, C. Quigley, J. Andrews, and G. Delacruz, "Co-Measure: Developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 4, pp. 1–12, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z
[8] E. D. Milakis, C. C. Argyrakou, T. Loukisas, D. G. Vangeli, M. C. Katsarou, and A. Lalou, "Comparative analysis of large language models as AI assistants for educational assessment: A case study in STEAM education," International Journal of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–55, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33545/27076571.2024.v5.i2a.97
[9] N. Park and Y. Ko, "Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education," in IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35606-3_38
[10] S. W. Kim and Y. Lee, "The analysis on research trends in programming based STEAM education in Korea," Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 1–11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35606-3_38
[11] M. Yee-King, M. Grierson, and M. d'Inverno, "STEAM WORKS: Student coders experiment more and experimenters gain higher grades," in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2017, pp. 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942873
[12] S. S. Hudin, "A Systematic Review of the Challenges in Teaching Programming for Primary Schools’ Students," Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.2023.08.01.008
[13] C. Williams, E. Alafghani, A. Daley, K. Gregory, and M. Rydzewski, "Teaching programming concepts to elementary students," in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344134
[14] S. L. Mason and P. J. Rich, "Preparing elementary school teachers to teach computing, coding, and computational thinking," Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 790–824, 2019. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184723/
[15] J. Waite and S. Sentance, Teaching programming in schools: A review of approaches and strategies. Raspberry Pi Foundation, 2021. https://www.raspberrypi.org/app/uploads/2021/11/Teaching-programming-in-schools-pedagogy-review-Raspberry-Pi-Foundation.pdf
[16] O. M. Nche, R. Boulware, S. M. Che, E. T. Kraemer, M. Sitaraman, and V. B. Zordan, "Basic code understanding challenges for elementary school children," in 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), vol. 1, 2020, pp. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272421
[17] K. M. Tank et al., "Investigating Sequencing as a Means to Computational Thinking in Young Children," International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 67–77, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v6i3.192
[18] B. Xie et al., "A theory of instruction for introductory programming skills," Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 2–3, pp. 205–253, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1565235
[19] Z. Wafula et al., "Assessing Computational Thinking Skills in Early Elementary Students: A Focus on Sequencing Tasks," in Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2024, pp. 400–405. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223964/
[20] S. A. Kalaian and R. M. Kasim, "Small-group vs. competitive learning in computer science classrooms: A meta-analytic review," in Innovative Teaching Strategies and New Learning Paradigms in Computer Programming, IGI Global, 2015, pp. 46–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7304-5.ch003
[21] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, "Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis," Review of Educational Research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–51, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
[22] D. A. Trytten, "Progressing from small group work to cooperative learning: A case study from computer science," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00572.x
[23] A. Remesh, "Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching," Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 158, 2013. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3724377/
[24] Y. Lou, P. C. Abrami, and S. d’Apollonia, "Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis," Review of Educational Research, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 449–521, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449
[25] S. Grover and R. Pea, "Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field," Educational Researcher, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
[26] S. Y. Lye and J. H. L. Koh, "Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 41, pp. 51–61, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
[27] M. Kalogiannakis, E. Tzagaraki, and S. Papadakis, "A systematic review of the use of BBC micro:bit in primary school," in Conference Proceedings. New Perspectives in Science Education 2021, Mar. 2021. https://conference.pixel-online.net/library_scheda.php?id_abs=5036
[28] C. A. Philbin, "Beyond Apps: Tablet and Micro: bit Devices as Tools for Creative Computing in Primary Schools," in Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice, Jan. 2024, pp. 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3633053.3633054
[29] P. Voštinár, "Micro: bit for STEAM Education," in 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), May 2024, pp. 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569427
[30] R. Krnaáč, M. Cápay, and Š. Koprda, "Education with physical device BBC micro: bit," in 2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), Nov. 2020, pp. 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379166
[31] M. Ellis, G. Thompson, and P. Haskell-Dowland, "Building a better micro: Bit IDE–teaching computer science," in INTED2020 Proceedings, 2020, pp. 8425–8433. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.2290
[32] S. Papadakis, E. Tzagkaraki, and M. Kalogiannakis, "Teaching Electricity Topics with Project-Based Learning and Physical Computing to Enhance Primary School Students in Science Education. An Educational Experiment with BBC Micro: bit Board," in International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Sep. 2023, pp. 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52667-1_31
[33] S. Y. Lu, C. L. Wu, and Y. M. Huang, "Evaluation of disabled STEAM-students’ education learning outcomes and creativity under the UN sustainable development goal: project-based learning oriented STEAM curriculum with micro: bit," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 679, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020679
[34] I. N. A. Saidah and N. Ngazizah, "Analysis of small group and individual teaching skills students of microteaching learning," Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJISE), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 143–151, 2022. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v1i3.357
[35] F. Evangelou, "The contribution of microteaching in teaching practice: A research approach to Greek students, prospective teachers," International Journal of Education and Research, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 53–68, 2022. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2022/December-2022/05.pdf
[36] D. Liu and P. Bhotisarn, "Influence of micro-teaching mode on students' performance of Datong Primary School in Sichuan province, China," Procedia of Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 73–73, 2024. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PMR/article/view/5371
[37] A. İlya, "A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts," Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2022. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1140040
[38] A. Rojas-López and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Personalized education for a programming course in higher education," in Research Anthology on Computational Thinking, Programming, and Robotics in the Classroom, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 344–367. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2411-7.ch017
[39] Y. Chen et al., "Edcode: Towards personalized support at scale for remote assistance in CS education," in 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), Aug. 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC50065.2020.9127260
[40] Y. Deng, D. Lu, C. J. Chung, D. Huang, and Z. Zeng, "Personalized learning in a virtual hands-on lab platform for computer science education," in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659291
[41] C. Piech et al., "Co-teaching computer science across borders: Human-centric learning at scale," in Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, Aug. 2020, pp. 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.340591
[42] M. Y. L. Yeung, H. H. M. Cheng, P. T. W. Chan, and D. W. Y. Kwok, "Communication technology and teacher–student relationship in the tertiary ESL classroom during the pandemic: A case study," SN Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 202, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01667-7
[43] K. Aldrup, B. Carstensen, and U. Klusmann, "Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1177–1216, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y
[44] J. C. Hong, J. H. Ye, Y. J. Ho, and H. Y. Ho, "Developing an Inquiry and Hands-On Teaching Model to Guide STEAM Lesson Planning for Kindergarten Children," Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 908–922, 2020. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=944945
[45] H. M. Thuneberg, H. S. Salmi, and F. X. Bogner, "How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module," Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 29, pp. 153–160, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
[46] C. Bartlett and L. Bos, "STEAM around the world: Successfully incorporating hands-on learning and diversity into children's programming," Journal of Library Administration, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 174–182, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2017.1392223
[47] A. Sullivan and A. Strawhacker, "Screen-free STEAM: Low-cost and hands-on approaches to teaching coding and engineering to young children," in Embedding STEAM in Early Childhood Education and Care, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_5
[48] T. Sapounidis, S. Tselegkaridis, and D. Stamovlasis, "Educational robotics and STEM in primary education: A review and a meta-analysis," Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 462–476, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2160394
[49] Y. Zhang, R. Luo, Y. Zhu, and Y. Yin, "Educational robots improve K-12 students’ computational thinking and STEM attitudes: Systematic review," Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1450–1481, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121994070
[50] M. Çetin and H. Ö. Demircan, "Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review," Early Child Development and Care, vol. 190, no. 9, pp. 1323–1335, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844
[51] D. Darmawansah, G. J. Hwang, M. R. A. Chen, and J. C. Liang, "Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: A systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3
[52] A. M. Simamora, "A Decade of Science Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PjBL): A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–78, 2024. https://doi.org/10.70232/pn3nek61
[53] A. Leavy, L. Dick, M. Meletiou‐Mavrotheris, E. Paparistodemou, and E. Stylianou, "The prevalence and use of emerging technologies in STEAM education: A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1061–1082, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12806
[54] E. D. Milakis, "Designing an online community of practice: The STEAM-Robots educational community," Neos Paidagogos, vol. 17, pp. 361–369, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6465023
[55] R. Kwan and B. T. M. Wong, "Latest advances in STEAM education research and practice: A review of the literature," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 323–339, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2021.114528
[56] J. Holbrook, M. Rannikmäe, and R. Soobard, "STEAM Education—A transdisciplinary teaching and learning approach," in Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory, Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_31
[57] A. K. Segarra-Morales and M. Juca-Aulestia, "Strategies and Skills in STEAM Education Systematic Review of the Literature," in International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, Jan. 2024, pp. 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54235-0_36
[58] R. Singha and S. Singha, "Application of Experiential, Inquiry-Based, Problem-Based, and Project-Based Learning in Sustainable Education," in Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Future: Innovative Strategies and Best Practices, IGI Global, 2024, pp. 109–128. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9859-0.ch006
[59] K. T. Quyen, N. Van Bien, and N. A. Thuan, "Micro: bit in Science Education: A systematic review," Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v9i1.19491
[60] R. Cabrera, A. Carrión, and M. Huerta, "A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of BBC Micro: Bit Research," in 2024 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), Mar. 2024, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE60625.2024.10500601
[61] A. M. Cederqvist, "Designing and coding with BBC micro: bit to solve a real-world task–a challenging movement between contexts," Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–35, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10865-w
[62] V. Mardian and W. Azzahra, "A Review: The Impact of Micro: Bit-Assisted STEM Education," International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2024. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.3
[63] T. C. Hsu, S. C. Chang, and Y. T. Hung, "How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature," Computers & Education, vol. 126, pp. 296–310, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
[64] L. Thibaut et al., "Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education," European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
[65] M. A. Almulla, "The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning," Sage Open, vol. 10, no. 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Copyright and License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Margarita Rafti, Emmanouil D. Milakis, Constantina Corazon Argyrakou, Dimitra G. Vangeli, Maria Christina Katsarou