Interactive Multimedia Learning for Vocational Electronics Education: Development, Validation, and Classroom Implementation
Scholarly dissemination Share this article
LinkedIn WhatsApp Facebook X Email
PDF (English)
XML (English)

Palabras clave

Multimedia interactiva Formación profesional en electrónica Modelo de desarrollo 4D Medios de aprendizaje digitales

Cómo citar

Marzalius, L. R., & Jasril, I. R. (2026). Interactive Multimedia Learning for Vocational Electronics Education: Development, Validation, and Classroom Implementation. Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.210
Article at a Glance

Publication Snapshot

Published 2026-02-28
Pages 16-29
References 22
Access
Now Welcoming Submissions
Call for Papers

Upcoming Issue

Volume4
Number3
October 2026
Submission Scope

J-HyTEL welcomes original and rigorous scholarship advancing education, media technology, and computer science applications.

Submit Manuscript Author Guidelines

Rolling submissions are accepted throughout the year.

Resumen

Este estudio presenta el diseño, el desarrollo y la evaluación empírica de una aplicación multimedia interactiva de aprendizaje para la enseñanza de la electrónica básica en la formación profesional. Para abordar retos persistentes como el aprendizaje pasivo, la comprensión conceptual limitada y la escasa participación de los alumnos, la investigación empleó el modelo de desarrollo 4D (Definir, Diseñar, Desarrollar y Difundir) para crear un entorno de aprendizaje digital en Adobe Animate. La aplicación integra animaciones dinámicas, visualizaciones basadas en vectores, texto explicativo y evaluaciones interactivas integradas para favorecer el cambio conceptual y el aprendizaje activo. La validez del contenido y de los medios se evaluó mediante valoraciones de expertos en la materia y especialistas en medios didácticos, mientras que la usabilidad y la practicidad se examinaron a través de pruebas de campo en las que participaron alumnos de 10.º curso de un programa de Ingeniería Audiovisual. Los resultados muestran altos niveles de precisión en los contenidos, alineación pedagógica y usabilidad de la interfaz. Los resultados sobre la viabilidad indican una gran aceptación por parte de los alumnos, una navegación intuitiva y una participación constante durante la implementación en el aula. Los datos de observación y de los cuestionarios revelan efectos positivos en la motivación para el aprendizaje y en los comportamientos participativos de los alumnos. Este estudio aporta evidencia empírica del valor pedagógico de los contenidos multimedia interactivos para la formación técnica basada en competencias y ofrece un marco de desarrollo replicable para integrar los medios de aprendizaje digitales en entornos de formación profesional. Los resultados tienen implicaciones prácticas y teóricas para los educadores, los diseñadores de planes de estudios y los responsables políticos que buscan mejorar la calidad del aprendizaje en la formación profesional orientada a la tecnología.

PDF (English)
XML (English)
https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.210
PDF (English)
XML (English)
Abstract Views886
File Downloads511
Researcher tools Save & Cite

RIS is compatible with Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Immediate opening depends on the visitor's browser and reference-manager settings.

Citas

22 References

[1] Y. Zou, F. Kuek, W. Feng, and X. Cheng, “Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, p. 1562391, Mar. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391

[2] C.-Y. Chang, C.-F. Yang, and W. Y. Leong, “Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Transforming Vocational Training in Digital Era,” Engineering Proceedings, vol. 103, no. 1, p. 9, Aug. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103009

[3] S. Rahmawati, S. Prestridge, A. G. Abdullah, and I. Widiaty, “Unpacking the digital competence challenge in vocational education: A case from Indonesia,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 12, p. 101803, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101803

[4] H. Zuo, M. Zhang, and W. Huang, “Lifelong learning in vocational education: A game-theoretical exploration of innovation, entrepreneurial spirit, and strategic challenges,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 100694, May–Jun. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100694

[5] G. Spöttl and L. Windelband, “The 4th industrial revolution – its impact on vocational skills,” Journal of Education and Work, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29–52, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1858230

[6] M. Sirk, “Vocational teaching practices for online learning during a state of emergency and its relation to collaboration with colleagues,” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 44, p. 100781, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100781

[7] D. Peter, M. Peter, and P. Peter, “Mapping the landscape of TVET education: a global bibliometric analysis,” Asian Education and Development Studies, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1179–1204, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2024-0141

[8] P. J. Woods and Y. Copur-Gencturk, “Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 138, p. 104415, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415

[9] F. Dursun and A. Aykan, “Exploring teachers’ narratives: Challenges and strategies for enhancing the teaching process,” SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251332557

[10] G. Gayatri, I. G. N. M. Jaya, and V. M. Rumata, “The Indonesian digital workforce gaps in 2021–2025,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 754, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010754

[11] M. Ali, B. Triyono, and T. Koehler, “Evaluation of Indonesian technical and vocational education in addressing the gap in job skills required by industry,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE), Surabaya, Indonesia, 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVEE50212.2020.9243222

[12] R. Mayer, “Multimedia learning,” Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 41, pp. 85–139, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6

[13] A. A. Aloraini, “The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University,” Journal of King Saud University–Languages and Translation, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002

[14] A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustainable Operations and Computers, vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

[15] R. A. Pratama, “Effectiveness of research and development (R&D) of android-based educational games to improve students’ mathematical reasoning: A meta-analysis approach,” Discovery Education, vol. 4, p. 315, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00486-7

[16] S. Thiagarajan, D. S. Semmel, and M. I. Semmel, Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Bloomington, 1974.

[17] J. Piaget, The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164730

[18] A. G. Gonzales II and G. G. Gonzales, “Exploring users’ acceptance of electronic circuits simulation: Implications to teaching basic electronics,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 9, 100821, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100821

[19] P. Zheng, J. Yang, J. Lou, et al., “Design and application of virtual simulation teaching platform for intelligent manufacturing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 12895, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62072-5

[20] R. Moreno and R. E. Mayer, “Interactive multimodal learning environments,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 309–326, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

[21] M. D. Abdulrahaman et al., “Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, e05312, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312

[22] Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55.

Copyright and License

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2026 Lira Rahma Marzalius, Ilmiyati Rahmy Jasril

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Esta página se traduce automáticamente para facilitar el acceso. Si hubiera diferencias de significado, la versión inglesa de J-HyTEL seguirá siendo la versión oficial.English