Palabras clave
Cómo citar
Resumen de la publicación
Próximo número
J-HyTEL welcomes original and rigorous scholarship advancing education, media technology, and computer science applications.
Rolling submissions are accepted throughout the year.
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es desarrollar y validar un recurso didáctico interactivo para el curso de Videografía Profesional de la SMK Negeri 2 Padang Panjang utilizando un enfoque de investigación basada en el diseño (DBR). El recurso, desarrollado con Adobe Captivate, integra elementos multimedia como imágenes, audio, tutoriales en vídeo y cuestionarios interactivos para mejorar la participación y la comprensión de los alumnos. El proceso de desarrollo siguió las fases iterativas de la DBR, que incluyen el análisis del problema, el diseño del prototipo, la validación por parte de expertos, la implementación y la reflexión. La validación realizada por seis expertos en tecnología educativa y en la materia en cuestión dio como resultado calificaciones que oscilaron entre «válido» y «muy válido» en cuanto a la calidad del contenido y el diseño instruccional. Las pruebas de viabilidad, en las que participaron 15 estudiantes, arrojaron una puntuación del 85,97 %, lo que indica una alta usabilidad y aceptación. Los resultados sugieren que los medios interactivos aumentan significativamente la motivación de los alumnos y favorecen el aprendizaje basado en competencias en la formación en videografía. Esta investigación contribuye al avance de la innovación didáctica en la formación profesional mediante la integración eficaz de contenidos multimedia y ofrece implicaciones prácticas para los educadores que desean mejorar los entornos de aprendizaje digital.
RIS is compatible with Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Immediate opening depends on the visitor's browser and reference-manager settings.
Citas
28 References[1] A. Y. K. Kahbi, A. Suhaimi, H. Hasmy, and M. F. Ab Jabal, “Innovation of digital multimedia: Recognizing the advantages,” e-Academia J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 224–239, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.24191/e-aj.v12i2.23996
[2] D. Wu, J. Wang, and Z. Che, “Digital education: Connotation, pathway, and trend,” Digit. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0021-z
[3] A.-K. E. Onjewu, E. S. Godwin, F. Azizsafaei, and D. Appiah, “The influence of technology use on learning skills among Generation Z: A gender and cross-country analysis,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241263227
[4] M. Limniou, I. Schermbrucker, and M. Lyons, “Traditional and flipped classroom approaches delivered by two different teachers: The student perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, pp. 797–817, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9636-8
[5] C. Blewett, “From traditional pedagogy to digital pedagogy,” in Disrupting Higher Education Curriculum. Constructing Knowledge: Curriculum Studies in Action, M. A. Samuel, R. Dhunpath, and N. Amin, Eds. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SensePublishers, 2016, pp. 267–281. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-896-9_16
[6] L. Tinoca, J. Piedade, S. Santos, A. Pedro, and S. Gomes, “Design-based research in the educational field: A systematic literature review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060410
[7] G. Poizat, A. Drakos, É. Ambrosetti, S. Flandin, L. Ria, and S. Leblanc, “Enactive design-based research in vocational and continuing education and training,” Vocat. Learn., pp. 537–563, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-024-09348-z
[8] S. M. H. Amiri, “Project-based learning pedagogy: Bridging theory and practice for real-world impact,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2454, pp. 1175–1189, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS
[9] M. S. H. Munna and M. R. Hossain, “Digital education revolution: Evaluating LMS-based learning and traditional approaches,” J. Innov. Technol. Converg., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 21–40, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.69478/jitc2024v6n002a03
[10] T. Mutanda, P. Gumede, T. Mayisela, and D. Ng’ambi, “Using a design-based research approach for a supplementary instruction programme: A pedagogical intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic,” S. Afr. J. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 271–285, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.20853/37-6-5243
[11] O. Omelianenko and N. Artyukhova, “Project-based learning: Theoretical overview and practical implications for local innovation-based development,” Econ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946x./2024-1-6
[12] M. Yue, M. S. Y. Jong, and Y. Dai, “Pedagogical design of K-12 artificial intelligence education: A systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 1–29, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620
[13] K. Brümmer, T. Alkemeyer, and R. Mitchell, Building Blocks of a Historical Overview of Tacit Knowledge. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93001-1_5
[14] R. Afrianti, T. R. Soraya, and M. Linawati, “Utilizing Adobe Captivate to develop French literature learning materials,” in Proc. 6th Annu. Int. Semin. Transform. Educ. Educ. Leadersh. (AISTEEL 2021), vol. 591, pp. 762–768, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211110.177
[15] F. Galatsopoulou, C. Kenterelidou, R. Kotsakis, and M. Matsiola, “Examining students’ perceptions towards video-based and video-assisted active learning scenarios in journalism and communication courses,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020074
[16] A. T. Capinding, “Students’ AI dependency in 3R’s: Questionnaire construction and validation,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1532–1543, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.11.2184
[17] K. V. Vlasenko, S. V. Volkov, I. V. Lovianova, I. V. Sitak, O. O. Chumak, and N. H. Bohdanova, “Exploring usability principles for educational online courses: A case study on an open platform for online education,” Educ. Technol. Q., no. 2, pp. 173–187, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.602
[18] M. Zamiri and A. Esmaeili, “Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review,” Adm. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017
[19] P. Sandra and P. Astariani, Developing Learning Evaluation Materials Assisted by the Quizizz Application to Support Self-Directed Learning. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-622-2
[20] A. P. Saubari and I. G. W. Sudatha, “Interactive learning multimedia based on problem-based learning models in fifth-grade science content,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 177–185, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i1.57354
[21] A. A. Bustomi, N. Khosiah, and A. Fathurrohman, “Developing Pancasila learning strategies through culture-based interactive media in elementary schools,” Al-Jahiz J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v3i1.622
[22] H. R. Wardani, R. A. Wulandary, and S. Riskika, “Evaluating the validity and reliability of competency instruments for tuberculosis nurses in primary health centers of Bondowoso District,” J. Health Sci. Pract., vol. 8, no. 2, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.29080/jhsp.v8i2.1275
[23] A. Theodorio, Z. Waghid, and A. Wambua, “Technology integration in teacher education: challenges and adaptations in the post-pandemic era,” Discov Educ., vol. 3, p. 242, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00341-1
[24] F. Mustafa, H. T. M. Nguyen, and X. Gao, “The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 126, p. 102380, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
[25] F.-K. Chiang, X. Shang, and L. Qiao, “Augmented reality in vocational training: A systematic review of research and applications,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 129, p. 107125, Apr. 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107125
[26] T. Anderson and J. Shattuck, “Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?,” Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 16–25, Jan. 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
[27] A. Tadesse, S. Lehesvuori, H. Posti-Ahokas, and J. Moate, “The learner-centred interactive pedagogy classroom: Its implications for dialogic interaction in Eritrean secondary schools,” Think. Skills Creat., vol. 50, p. 101379, Dec. 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101379
[28] H. Zuo, M. Zhang, and W. Huang, “Lifelong learning in vocational education: A game-theoretical exploration of innovation, entrepreneurial spirit, and strategic challenges,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 100694, May–Jun. 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100694
Copyright and License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Dita Luthfillah, Asrul Huda, Ika Parma Dewi, Yevgeniya Daineko