RICOSRE-Assisted Learning with Podcasts in Biology Education: Enhancing Analytical Thinking and Communication Skills
Scholarly dissemination Share this article
LinkedIn WhatsApp Facebook X Email
PDF (IND)

Keywords

RICOSRE Podcast Analytical Thinking Skills Communication Skills

How to Cite

Haka, N. B., Sari, L. K., Supriyadi, Handoko, A., Hidayah, N., & Masya, H. (2023). RICOSRE-Assisted Learning with Podcasts in Biology Education: Enhancing Analytical Thinking and Communication Skills. Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.v1i1.23
Article at a Glance

Publication Snapshot

Published 28.02.2023
Pages 18-25
References 20
Access Open Access
Now Welcoming Submissions
Call for Papers

Upcoming Issue

Volume4
Number3
October 2026
Submission Scope

J-HyTEL welcomes original and rigorous scholarship advancing education, media technology, and computer science applications.

Submit Manuscript Author Guidelines

Rolling submissions are accepted throughout the year.

Abstract

In the 21st century, digital technology has rapidly advanced, with the general population commonly possessing devices such as smartphones, laptops, or computers at home. Podcasts offer advantages in terms of time efficiency and multitasking, allowing learners to engage in educational content while engaged in various activities such as commuting, writing, working, and more. This research utilizes the RICOSRE learning model with Podcasts to investigate its impact on students’ analytical thinking and communication skills in biology. The study employs a quantitative approach, precisely the quasi-experimental method, to assess the influence of the RICOSRE learning model, supported by podcasts, on students’ analytical thinking and communication skills in biology. Data collection involves pretests, posttests, and observation sheets. The research findings demonstrate a positive impact of the RICOSRE learning model. The experimental group outperformed the control group in analytical thinking ability, with an average percentage of 2.90% compared to 1.85%. Communication skills observation sheets show an average percentage of 76.91% for the experimental group and 59.44% for the control group. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the RICOSRE learning model in enhancing students’ analytical thinking and communication skills in biology education.

PDF (IND)
https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.v1i1.23
PDF (IND)
Abstract Views1437
File Downloads1413
Researcher tools Save & Cite

RIS is compatible with Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Immediate opening depends on the visitor's browser and reference-manager settings.

Research Transparency

Declarations reported in the published article

View Full PDF
Competing Interests

Penulis menyatakan bahwa tidak ada konflik kepentingan yang terlibat dalam penyusunan artikel ini.

View statement in PDF · PDF page 7

Statements are reproduced from the final published PDF using exact section headings. The PDF remains the authoritative version. Absence of a panel does not establish that the declaration is absent from the PDF.

References

20 References

[1] B. Rana and S. S. Rathore, “Industry 4.0 – Applications, Challenges and Opportunities in Industries and Academia: A Review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 79, pp. 389–394, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.162

[2] A. Oke and F. A. P. Fernandes, “Innovations in Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of the Education Sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 31, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031

[3] M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, R. Suman, and E. S. Gonzalez, “Understanding The Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Improving Environmental Sustainability,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 203–217, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.008

[4] A. Szymkowiak, B. Melović, M. Dabić, K. Jeganathan, and G. S. Kundi, “Information Technology and Gen Z: The Role of Teachers, The Internet, and Technology in The Education of Young People,” Technol. Soc., vol. 65, p. 101565, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

[5] D. Mayangsari and D. R. Tiara, “Podcast sebagai Media Pembelajaran di Era Milenial,” J. Golden Age, vol. 3, no. 02, p. 126, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.29408/goldenage.v3i02.1720

[6] N. Norhayati and S. Jayanti, “Pemanfaatan Teknologi untuk Mendukung Kegiatan Belajar Secara Mandiri (Studi Kasus: Penggunaan Podcast oleh Mahasiswa di Kota Palangkaraya),” J. Hum. Teknol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–36, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.34128/jht.v6i1.73

[7] R. Nur Rafiza and Irwansyah, “Podcast: Potensi dan Pertumbuhannya di Indonesia,” J. Teknol. Inf. DAN Komun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtikp.v11i1.132

[8] C. Schreiber and R. Klose, “Mathematical Audio-Podcasts for Teacher Education and School,” Teach. Curric., vol. 17, no. 2, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v17i2.161

[9] E. Fadilah, P. Yudhapramesti, and N. Aristi, “Podcast sebagai Alternatif Distribusi Konten Audio,” J. Kaji. Jurnalisme, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 90–104, Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.24198/kj.v1i1.10562

[10] H. B. A. Jayawardana and R. S. D. Gita, “Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, 2020, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–66. https://doi.org/10.24252/psb.v6i1.15544

[11] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 2001.

[12] F. C. Lunenburg, “Communication: The Process, Barriers, and Improving Effectiveness,” Schooling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2010.

[13] Y. Iriantara, “Komunikasi Pembelajaran,” Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media, 2014.

[14] M. Marfuah, “Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 148–160, 2017.

[15] S. Mahanal and S. Zubaidah, “Model Pembelajaran Ricosre yang Berpotensi Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 676–685, 2017.

[16] S. M. S. Zubaidah and S. Mahanal, “Potensi Model Pembelajaran RICOSRE dalam Meningkatkan High Order Thinking Siswa,” Artik. Biol. Educ. Dep. Univ. Negeri Malang. Diakses pada tanggal, vol. 12, 2019.

[17] D. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D,” 2013.

[18] A. Suryanda, E. P. Azrai, and N. Wari, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation (GI) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis Siswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan,” Biosf. J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 37–44, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.9-2.6

[19] I. J. Sari, D. Murni, and S. Sjaifuddin, “Peningkatan Kecakapan Komunikasi Siswa Menggunakan Pembelajaran Bilingual Preview Review dengan Setting Jigsaw Pada Konsep Pengelolaan Lingkungan,” J. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 121, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i2.741

[20] B. Rana and S. S. Rathore, “Industry 4.0 – Applications, Challenges and Opportunities in Industries and Academia: A Review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 389–394, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.162

Copyright and License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Nukhbatul Bidayati Haka, Lilis Kusuma Sari, Supriyadi, Akbar Handoko, Nur Hidayah, Hardiyansyah Masya

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.